Test for the presence of autocorrelation in the modified Gompertz model used in the fitting the growth of sludge microbes on PEG 600
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/jemat.v3i1.238Keywords:
Polyethylene Glycol, modified Gompertz, sludge microbes, ordinary least squares method, autocorrelationAbstract
Polyethylene glycols (PEGs), are nephrotoxic, and are employed in numerous industrial sectors. Their biodegradation by microbes could be a potential tool for bioremediation. A lot of bacterial growth reports overlook primary modelling despite the fact that modelling exercises can expose important parameters. Earlier, we have employed several growth models to model the growth of sludge microbes on PEG 600. We found out that the modified Gompertz model via nonlinear regression utilizing the least square method was the most effective model to describe the growth curve. Nonlinear regression using the least square method generally utilizes the assumption that data points do not depend on each other or the value of a data point is not dependent on the value of preceding or proceeding data points or do not exhibit autocorrelation. In this work, the Durbin–Watson statistic to check for the presence of autocorrelation in the growth model was carried out.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).